Welcome to Hyperion Records, an independent British classical label devoted to presenting high-quality recordings of music of all styles and from all periods from the twelfth century to the twenty-first.
Hyperion offers both CDs, and downloads in a number of formats. The site is also available in several languages.
Please use the dropdown buttons to set your preferred options, or use the checkbox to accept the defaults.
A generous helping of Tchaikovskian melodic charm—including the G major 'Grand Sonata' and the virtuosic 'Dumka'—sheds welcome light onto a less well-known side of the composer's output.
Tchaikovsky had the greatest respect for the music of Robert Schumann, whose influence on his piano music is obvious. Alongside his Russian colleagues, Tchaikovsky prized Schumann for his innovative spirit, but also for his ardent expression of emotion, which led him to avoid superficial virtuosity. Schumann’s piano music was often very challenging to play, but it was personal and intimate even so: the difficulties emerged from the spirit of the piece, and not from any external desire to impress the ladies (a charge levelled at Liszt, rather uncharitably). Tchaikovsky adhered closely to Schumann’s intimate approach outside the occasional showy flourish.
But this is not to say that Tchaikovsky’s piano music was derivative, since he developed his own unmistakable style, with boundless melodic invention and a clarity of textural layers that bring to mind his orchestral sonorities. There are, if you listen closely, 'woodwind' passages (as in one of the episodes in the final rondo of the G major sonata) or climaxes of roaring brass (as in the first movement of the same work). Konstantin Igumnov, a passionate advocate of Tchaikovsky’s piano (music, and one of the first to record the sonata), claimed that the piano pieces do not 'play themselves', and do not offer sonorities of self-evident beauty, in the manner of Chopin or Liszt: pianists need to discover how to convey them effectively, as they must do with Beethoven, or indeed, with Schumann. As Igumnov put it, 'Tchaikovsky’s piano music is difficult to perform, but not impossible'.
Peter Donohoe disagrees, insisting that all music requires performers to find the right approach, so he does not see Tchaikovsky as any kind of exception. He writes:
It is inexplicable to me that Tchaikovsky’s solo piano music should remain so infrequently performed, containing as it does all of the composer’s characteristic harmony, his wonderful melodic gift, his capacity for majestic gesture, magically beautiful moments, immense sadness, and passages of extreme excitement. His piano writing is often orchestral in texture, but also demonstrates the direct but very diverse pianistic influences of Liszt and Schumann, and incorporates in an almost naive way folk-style dance rhythms and melodies from Russia. This treasure trove is immensely rewarding to play, whether it be a small-scale salon piece such as the Humoresque, Op 10 No 2, or large in scale, such as is the gigantic 'Grand Sonata' in G major.
Scherzo à la russe in B flat major Op 1 No 1 (1867)
Here Tchaikovsky used a folk tune that he himself had recorded while vacationing on a Ukrainian estate (as often happens in such cases, no one has been able to pinpoint the original song). The inspiration for a 'Russian scherzo' comes from Glinka’s highly influential orchestral fantasy Kamarinskaya, which subjects a tiny scrap of folk melody to endless variation with great energy and ingenuity. Tchaikovsky’s Russian style is not at all purist: it never intends to imitate folk music or set it in a museum frame, but instead is full of spooky chromaticism and a sweet lyrical sensibility that was often frowned upon by his peers. His little folk tune is only the beginning of an exciting journey full of twists and turns before the glorious virtuosic coda. The piece was premiered by Nikolai Rubinstein, Tchaikovsky’s mentor and friend, and composer decided it was good enough to be published as his 'Opus 1'.
Impromptu in E flat minor Op 1 No 2 (1864)
The Impromptu was only paired with the Scherzo by accident. The publisher Jurgenson discovered it written next to the Scherzo in Tchaikovsky’s manuscript and saw no problem in printing both. Tchaikovsky discovered the mistake too late, and was not at all pleased, since he saw the Impromptu as a student piece. But listeners may well thank Jurgenson for preserving this fascinating piece, which presents a typical Romantic contrast between the turbulent reality consuming the protagonist (in the tarantella-style outer sections) and a beautiful dream—a serene Italianate melody with harp-like accompaniment, before harsh reality returns. The design prefigures Tchaikovsky’s great symphonic fantasia Francesca da Rimini.
Capriccio in G flat major Op 8 (1870)
The Capriccio presents a similar Romantic contrast, now between the bustling life of the outside world and the quiet intimacy of the inner life. The intricate orchestral textures of the outer sections whimsically displace the beats, in the manner of Schumann. The middle section is a sweet melody, a dreamy recollection of a waltz once heard at a ball, perhaps, which would be quite at home in a Tchaikovsky ballet. The piece was dedicated to Karl Klindworth, a student of Liszt’s, a friend of Wagner’s, and also Tchaikovsky’s colleague at the Moscow Conservatoire.
Six pieces on a single theme Op 21 (1873)
Tchaikovsky dedicated these six pieces to his former composition professor Anton Rubinstein, who was also an internationally renowned pianist, hoping that Rubinstein would soon include them in his vast repertoire. Frustratingly, Rubinstein left them untouched for ten years, until he finally brought them before the public in 1883. Tchaikovsky, consoled, said that 'they could not be played better than this'. Several of the pieces became staple items in Rubinstein’s repertoire for his tours abroad.
It is clear that Tchaikovsky wished to impress his former teacher with his compositional sophistication, choosing as his vehicle a deft demonstration of his ability to use the same theme six times in pieces of such different character that only the most attentive listeners will discern the common thread. Tchaikovsky knew that one of Rubinstein’s concert favourites, Schumann’s Carnaval, took the same approach to its thematic material. In the Prelude and the Fugue, the theme hints at its roots in Russian folk song, but also shows that it can ably support the earnest contrapuntal treatment in the manner of Bach. The Impromptu is the most overtly Schumannesque, ever capricious and submerging the theme inside its fleet figuration.
The Funeral March does its best to conceal any semblance of a walking pulse so that it can convey a more personal grief. Its middle section is a passionate outburst that culminates in a quotation of the Dies irae chant from the Catholic requiem mass, which had become a much-used symbol of death in the hands of Romantic composers. The Mazurka takes off from where the Funeral March had stopped, inheriting some gloom, but eventually brightens up. The final Scherzo is built around Tchaikovsky’s favourite device of alternating between two and three beats (6/8 and 3/4), and hovers between pure playfulness and the desire for a lyrical utterance, which has a chance to break through in the more placid middle section.
Aveu passionné Op posth. (1891?, published 1949)
After a disappointing premiere of his symphonic ballad Vovyevoda in 1891, Tchaikovsky destroyed the score (although it was later reconstructed), but he based this piano piece on some of the music from the abandoned work. While the piano version is entitled 'a passionate avowal (of love)', the music of Vovyevoda at this point actually represents a bitter reproach. The story behind Vovyevoda, which comes from a ballad by the great Polish poet Mickiewicz, was known to Tchaikovsky through Pushkin’s translation, and in this scene, a young lover is bitterly reproaching his beloved for having married an older man for his money. Aveu inherits the cello register of the Vovyevoda theme, and its dark and brooding atmosphere.
Sonata in G major Op 37 (1878)
'I was at Nikolai Rubinstein’s, where he asked me to listen to him play my sonata. He played it superbly … I was simply astounded by the artistry and energy he summoned to play this rather dry and complicated piece.' These words of Tchaikovsky’s show that he was uncertain about the quality of this sonata, but Rubinstein’s performance managed to allay his fears. It is accepted today as the pinnacle of Tchaikovsky’s music for solo piano, and is written on a truly symphonic scale, rivalling some of Tchaikovsky’s symphonies in richness and intensity.
Tchaikovsky began writing the sonata on the shores of Lake Geneva in the spring of 1878, after abandoning his wife and fleeing Russia. He completed it over the following months while staying on his sister’s Ukrainian country estate, still away from society. Like the fourth symphony which preceded it, the sonata represents a protagonist through its lyrical music, contrasted to the hostile clamour of the world outside. The brilliant march-like theme that opens and closes the first movement has an air of forced triumph, and Tchaikovsky underlines his ironic intent by introducing the Dies irae motif, at first lyrically. The tragic meaning of the movement is revealed in the shattering central climax.
The second movement is an expression of grief, introverted and tongue-tied, conveyed through a melody that is fixated on two notes, unable to take flight. The Scherzo third movement is highly attractive in itself with its capricious rhythms and agile figurations, but on the large scale, it is an escapist flight from the serious questions posed in the previous movements. The finale rushes past with a kaleidoscopic sequence of themes, each one following breathlessly upon the other. One theme stands out as a powerful lyrical utterance, and the listener can imagine it worked up into a triumphant apotheosis at the close, but Tchaikovsky rejects this move in favour of a more ambiguous ending. The meaning of the movement can be found in the composer’s own comments on the finale of his fourth symphony: 'If you cannot find happiness within yourself, look to others. Get out and mingle. Look at the good time they are having, simply by surrendering themselves to joy. Life is bearable after all.'
Humoresque Op 10 No 2 (1872)
One wonders if this piece stirred in Stravinsky’s memory as he was writing his ballet Petrushka: a plaintive, angular motif is set alongside a joyful and simple-hearted dance of the sort played on the accordion by street musicians in every Russian city—the aristocratic Tchaikovsky had a keen ear for street music. Here, he draws much humour from the two repeated notes in a middle voice. The contrasting middle section is loosely based on a French folk song 'La fille aux oranges', which Tchaikovsky heard in Nice just before he started to write the piece.
Dumka Op 59 (1886)
This piece was written to a commission from the Parisian music publisher Félix Mackar, who evidently sought a substantial virtuosic piece. The title 'Dumka' (meaning 'thought' or 'rumination') points to an Eastern-European genre of improvised song with instrumental accompaniment, which Tchaikovsky had most likely encountered in Ukraine. Switching between slow and fast folk-inspired music, the Dumka is a cousin of Liszt’s Hungarian Rhapsodies, and Tchaikovsky originally gave the piece the working title of 'rhapsody'. But there is more to the design: it is a rustic scene with a hint of dramatic action, possibly even with a tragic outcome, as in many a Romantic ballade. The doleful improvisatory beginning is like a preamble to the telling of a legend. The fast section suggests a folk dance, which quickly turns raucous. The merriment is interrupted by a lyrical variation on the same material—as if the spotlight falls on a new character. The dance then resumes, but only to be swept away by a dramatic wave that leads to the climax. The return of the doleful theme brings the narrative frame to a close.
Marina Frolova-Walker ï¿½ 2019