'This is an irresistible disc' (The Good GD Guide)
'We are exceptionally lucky to have such brilliantly persuasive advocates of such wonderful music' (Gramophone)
'The clarity of intonation and line has the freshness of an illuminated page of manuscript revealed for the first time for two thirds of a millenium' (Early Music Review)
Other recommended albums
Truly, it seems to me very unusual and very novel … in my opinion, it is a long time since I have made anything so good.
This is the most prolific composer of the fourteenth century, Guillaume de Machaut, referring to a polyphonic song that he had recently composed. Although Machaut is describing the individuality of his own work in this letter, his description of the ballade in question as ‘very unusual’ (mout estrainges) and ‘very novel’ (mout nouviaus) evokes the whole repertoire of fourteenth-century French music. In Middle French estrainges means ‘unusual’, ‘strange’ or even ‘incomprehensible’, and it is easy to believe that Machaut and other composers of the Ars Nova were proud of the exotic effects that their music released when performed, effects so fleeting that they cannot all have been foreseen during the compositional process. Sometimes, it seems, the French composers of the fourteenth century directed their parts with a mischievously subversive attitude to harmony that was not shared by their successors in the fifteenth. It is hard to imagine the mature Dufay, for example, creating the wanton minor second that Solage produces, by impeccable melodic logic, in the third measure of Tres gentil cuer.
As for Machaut’s nouviaus, its meanings are similar to estrainges, including ‘unusual’, ‘original’ and ‘novel’; like estrainges, it seems designed to present composition as an exploratory and innovative process, and indeed the sheer originality of much fourteenth-century French music is very striking. Once we have penetrated sufficiently far into this repertoire to see beyond the obvious similarities of style and technique which characterize all Ars Nova chansons, we find that the variety of the music is inexhaustible; in piece after piece it seems that a composer has looked for a fresh solution to the artistic problems of making a successful polyphonic song. Some composers settle for the kind of simple loveliness that distinguishes many of the finest fourteenth-century French songs, especially those to be found among the hundreds of anonymous pieces. Puis qu’autrement ne puis avoir is an example. Others, however, look further afield. Soit tart, tempre, main ou soir explores the possibilities of a carefully controlled, luxuriant harmony in four parts that is deliciously embittered at certain points by musica ficta adjustments (primarily some strategic uses of G sharp) that owe something to the mature style of Guillaume de Machaut, both in his secular works and in the Messe de Nostre Dame. From the number of sharps in the sources of this piece it is plain that the scribes who copied Soit tart, tempre, main ou soir were not sure how far this process of musica ficta colouring should extend. In Tres gentil cuer we hear Solage, one of the most gifted composers of the fourteenth century, working with three parts to develop some of the ideas that reach their zenith in his four-part virelai Joieux de cuer, which can be be heard on The Medieval Romantics (Helios CDH55293). These include an almost relentlessly polymetric texture (in which, to use modern concepts and terminology, 3/4 is constantly set against 6/8), and the rhythmic figure in the Cantus, a fingerprint of Solage’s style. In Quand je ne voy Guillaume de Machaut sets out to spin a substantial piece with only the barest minimum of text, setting certain syllables to extended melismas that use melodic sequence, a device that occasionally attracted him.
However estrainges or nouviaus these pieces may be, they often display a lucid structure of words and music that a fourteenth-century listener would have searched for in any new piece. Guillaume de Machaut’s two-part ballade Riches d’amour provides an excellent introduction to this structuring. Machaut’s ballades in this vein are often superbly designed to display the best in a beautiful voice, discreetly accompanied by another voice or (as here) by an instrument, and exploiting the kind of tactical tuning that is vital in the performance of his works. (Notice, for example, how the cadential major sixth is widened in the first line at ‘mendians’, or in the third at ‘diseteus’.) As we listen to the piece and read the text, we discern that each line of the poetry forms a complete musical phrase, and that within these larger phrases Machaut scrupulously relates the sub-phrases to the position of the caesura (generally after the fourth syllable). The opening lines, for example, are treated in this way:
Riches d’amour · et mendians d’amie (4+6)
The musical setting follows the metrical structure with complete fidelity.
The sheer verve of the pieces recorded here accounts for much of their attraction. They defy any faint-hearted performance. A passage from Machaut’s Donnez, signeurs offers a particularly striking example (Example 3). In measure 9 the Contratenor provides a momentary pedal point beneath a flourish in the Cantus that audaciously snatches at F sharp (a pungent note in a piece built on C and F) and which seems particularly extrovert for the way the upward movement e–f–g is rushed through twice in succession.
The fluidity of the Cantus throughout this section—and the inability of modern notation with regular barring to express it—is shown by the brackets above the stave which mark out what are, viewed in rhythmic terms, four virtually identical phrases. They are superbly balanced in their rhythmic weight and melodic contour. As these phrases dash past, the Contratenor chases the Tenor in measure 11, just a quaver beat behind, invigorating a simple cadential pattern with displacement syncopation that resolves quite conventionally in measure 12. The accented dissonances in measure 11 also contrive to give that measure a thrilling sense of forceful and directed motion.
The English Pieces
By far the most impressive of the English pieces—and perhaps the most impressive piece on this recording—is the four-part Credo by Pycard. This composer is possibly to be identified with a singer of that name who was a clerk in the chapel of John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster, around 1390 and perhaps still there in 1399. This piece, which is vast by medieval standards (for it runs to some six minutes of through-composed polyphony in four parts) places Pycard into the front rank of European composers between the 1380 and 1420; taken together with his other works (such as the five-part Gloria recorded by Gothic Voices on The Service of Venus and Mars, Hyperion CDS44251/3) they show him to be perhaps the most talented composer on the European scene during those forty years. He outclasses the much more famous Ciconia, whose Mass music is of limited interest for the most part, and what Ciconia has in his best motets—a rhythmic energy, a love of short melodic phrases that chase one another in the upper voices in a most exhilarating way—Pycard also has. (Indeed, there is much in Pycard’s music that one might wish to trace to Italian example.) Pycard brings to these things a love of full, triadic sonority that is alien to Ciconia and distinctively English.
The French Pieces of the fifteenth century
Lancaster and Valois
Christopher Page © 1992
Other albums in this series